To the extent that you do not know formally what payment policies payers in your area have with respect to FESS, we encourage you to find out. Particularly, you might with to focus on payer policies with respect to post-operative billing of 31231 and 31237. You may collect this information with the assistance of other rhinologists in your area. The Committee encourages members to challenge inappropriate payer policies. Attached is a letter from ARS outside legal counsel that could be sent by you to your payer if the issue is post-operative billing of 31231 and 31237. We encourage you to follow up the letter with a meeting with the medical director of the payer. We advise against meeting with lower level payer representatives. You may wish to have other rhinologists in your community accompany you to the meeting. You should demand that the payer provide its authority to establish a 90 day global period for FESS procedures and the experience and training of any payer medical consultant with FESS. If the medical director refuses to change the payer's policy, consider pursuing other alternatives that include, requesting an administrative fair hearing on the payment denial; contacting your State Insurance Commissioner, Attorney General's Office, Chamber of Commerce, Better Business Bureau, and local press. You could pursue a court challenge. However, such an endeavor is expensive and success can never be assured. As stated above, we encourage you to work with other rhinologists in your area to resolve inappropriate payer policies. You may work cooperatively with respect to informing the payer about FESS procedures and persuading the payer to change its policy. Ultimately, a rhinologist may decide not to participate in a plan if the payment policy is inappropriate. The rhinologist always has the right to opt out and to inform patients of a payer's unreasonable policies. Rhinologists may not, however, join together in a group boycott of a payer. It may be, however, that when a particular payer's policy is well known in the community, a number of rhinologists independently and separately come to the same conclusion that nonparticipation with that payer is the only reasonable conclusion. If a number of rhinologists independently come to that same conclusion that action is legal. Joseph B. Jacobs, M.D.
Return to Patient Advocacy Homepage.
|
||||||||